There is a myth that $110 billion was devoted entirely to New Orleans for after the levees failed during Hurricane Katrina. But according to Brookings Institution, federal allocations supported responses to three hurricanes (Wilma, Rita and Katrina) that struck the Gulf Coast in the fall of 2005. Further, the aid was to all five states between Florida and Texas. There is also general assumption that much of those dollars support longer-term recovery and reconstruction, when in fact, the bulk of the early funds provided emergency housing and other aid to families and support to states and federal agencies for clean up and other emergency activities immediately after the storms. Almost $20 billion was flood insurance payouts to citizens collecting on their own private insurance claims.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Congress gave you $110 billion. Isn’t that enough?
Frequently Asked Questions
- Why rebuild a city that’s sinking?
- Why rebuild a city built below sea level?
- Why rebuild a city that’s vulnerable to hurricanes?
- Didn’t the local politicians divert federal levee money into local projects?
- The Corps admitted they’re at fault so why another study?
- If the Corps is largely to blame, why did Louisiana consolidate its levee boards?
- Didn’t the Mayor wait until too late to issue an evacuation order?
- Haven’t New Orleans residents known for years that this could happen?
- Congress gave you $110 billion. Isn’t that enough?
- Why is the engineering community reluctant to blame the Corps for errors that caused so much calamity?
- Why Rebuild and Protect the City of New Orleans?

