No, Ms. Liberto…it’s not OK to use Katrina shorthand

The water line is visible on this home in the Lakeview neighborhood in New Orleans

The water line is visible on this home in the Lakeview neighborhood in New Orleans

Last month, noted author John McQuaid chastized a reporter for the New York Times for lazy journalism, that is, describing the flooding of New Orleans as “caused” by Katrina.

It was civil engineering failure that caused the flooding, not a weather event. Such lazy journalism or “Katrina shorthand” is harmful to metro New Orleans’ recovery.

So when a reporter for CNN Money used Katrina shorthand, I wrote to her about it. In the first sentence of her story about black-owned businesses in New Orleans, Jennifer Liberto described Katrina as causing “utter destruction to” New Orleans’ Lower Ninth Ward neighborhood.

Saying Katrina destroyed the Lower Ninth is like saying traffic destroyed the bridge in Minneapolis. The bridge didn’t do what it was designed to do, and neither did the levees protecting the New Orleans neighborhood.

Ms. Liberto responded. Here is her email, unedited.

Thank you. Am well aware, as I lost my childhood home and a few neighbors to 12 feet of water in Lakeview

I made sure to make it clear that the levees failed in the main bar story I did. Four years ago, Katrina punched holes in flood walls and pushed Lake Pontchartrain into homes, stores and the lives of thousands of people.” But the stories are all focused on the economy and biz, so I didnt devote as much space to how it happened

But as a New Orleanian, I do blame the hurricane for upending my family and home and I think it’s OK to imply that such destruction might not have happened had the hurricane not passed through. Thanks for reading.

CNN’s Liberto seems to be defending her lazy journalism by saying she wouldn’t have lost her “childhood home and a few neighbors” had the hurricane not passed through.

I respond by saying the Minneapolis bridge would have done just fine if no traffic were allowed on it. Levees, like bridges, are supposed to perform a function. The traffic and Katrina both revealed structural flaws and blatant civil engineering incompetence.

Certainly, CNN must hold its writers to a high standard of accuracy and clarity. This applies as well when talking about what caused the damage to the city of New Orleans in 2005.

It’s not okay to use Katrina shorthand. Lot’s of reporters and journalists get the story right. Ms. Liberto can, too.

3 responses to “No, Ms. Liberto…it’s not OK to use Katrina shorthand”

  1. You guys are awesome. Stay on the media and keep educating the media about how to report. It is a shame that we have to constantly educate, supposedly smart and major media outlets, on New Orleans but if not us; than who? Once they get corrected, if they still keep up with half truths and mis-statements, then we know that it is an agenda.

  2. Jim says:

    Congress uses the Army Corps of Engineers
    as a pork conduit to pass out billions
    with very little accountability.
    Also, the press is led around by disinformation
    dupes to never fully bring out all the malfeasance
    in the Army Corps.
    Levee Org is doing a public service to
    high light things, as some work overtime
    to sweep dirt under the rug, to gloss
    over the depths of COE corruption.

  3. Judith Martin says:

    The levees were fated to fail: Years ago, I wondered why all the money was put out to build that high wall on the Lakeview side of the Orleans Canal — with cute little Greek-shaped things along the top. If the City was going to strengthen one levee, why wouldn’t it strengthen them all? Then I had a premonition — I’m no psychic, but I am a student of history and politics — that the City didn’t give a “snap of the fingers” about the solidity of the other levees, and it never would.

    Three family members with whom I lived died in our house in Lakeview in the stinking, freezing waters of 2005. The Levee Board and the Army Corps of Engineers murdered them. Enough said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.