Censure of LSU, a Boost to Ivor van Heerden’s Credibility

Dr. Ivor van Heerden

An academic watchdog group has voted to place LSU on academic censure for mistreatment of Dr. Ivor van Heerden who, after Katrina, was fired for blaming the Army Corps of Engineers for the failure of the levees and the drowning of New Orleans.

The American Association of University Professors, AAUP has found merit in Dr. van Heerden’s claim that LSU officials retaliated against him because they feared losing funding.

Louisiana State University receives large federal grants from the Corps of Engineers.

This brings to a close an investigation which began with a 30-page report revealing that LSU had a ‘prevailing position’ on the cause of the flooding and that Dr. van Heerden’s research and public stance ran contrary to that position. In November 2005, Vice Chancellor Michael Ruffner wrote,

“…LSU will engage in helping with [the] recovery of Louisiana, not in pointing blame. The chancellor has begun initiatives toward this goal, and it would not be useful to have the university associated, intentionally or not, with efforts aimed at causation.”

LSU’s apparent ‘prevailing position’ that the flooding was a natural disaster was in direct conflict with the findings of the investigation, called Team Louisiana that Dr. van Heerden was leading with funding from the Louisiana State Department of Transportation.

Credit: Fred Mulhearn, Baton Rouge Advocate

Marcia Cooke, adjunct professor at Loyola University and a high school math teacher finds it frightening that LSU had a ‘prevailing position’ at all regarding the deadly flooding.

“It is not a state university’s job to promote a prevailing position,” said Ms. Cooke.  “I feel it should be the opposite, that a university should be the arena where ideas are discussed, debated and researched.”

U.S. District Judge James J. Brady ruled on July 7, 2011 that Ivor van Heerden’s whistleblower claims against LSU can move forward.

4 responses to “Censure of LSU, a Boost to Ivor van Heerden’s Credibility”

  1. Elisabeth Gleckler says:

    I remember Ivor coming into New Orleans with presentations in the neighborhoods about his findings. The auditorium was packed. I was grateful for his attention to sharing information with all of us regular people. Thanks, Ivor.

  2. S. Rosenthal says:

    Ivor’s number concern was, and still is, helping other people. A true hero.

  3. John Koeferl says:

    What Ivor’s dedicated work exposes is not only the failed levees but LSU’s buy-in to the Corps’ system that values itself, the stream of public funds, and its own projects more than it values and protects the public or environment.

  4. S. Rosenthal says:

    We agree. The harassment of Ivor van Heerden was an attack on academic freedom.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *